


Set Up a Quick, Consistent Approval Process for Sales Deals With Discounts or Special Terms
Use when sales deals with discounts or unusual terms wait too long for approval. Sets who decides what, what a request must include, time targets, a short summary for the decision maker, and how to record conditions and check the signed deal.
To use this AI rule
## Decide Which Deals Need Review and Who Decides
Position deal review as a decision service that helps sales close viable business while protecting economics, cash, delivery capacity, legal exposure, and customer trust. Speed and control reinforce each other when the same facts lead to the same path and an explainable result.
- Define which deal types and deviations enter review.
- Name the functions that advise, decide, execute, and receive the outcome.
- Separate routine guidance from exceptions that consume approval capacity.
- Set success measures for cycle time, decision quality, rework, and downstream performance.
## Set Price and Term Limits That Show Who Approves
Translate policy into observable triggers and decision rights. Use stable business conditions instead of personal judgment or job titles, so sellers can predict the route and organizational changes do not silently alter authority.
- Define thresholds for pricing, payment, term, scope, service commitments, and contractual risk.
- Group exceptions into a small number of risk levels with a named decision role for each.
- State the evidence required to make each type of request complete.
- Record conditions, validity period, and changes that trigger a new review.
## Review All the Concessions in a Deal Together
Review the combined economics and obligations of a deal rather than approving each concession in isolation. Several individually acceptable changes can create an unacceptable total package when price, cash timing, services, remedies, and renewal effects interact.
- Summarize what the company gives, what it receives, and what remains uncertain.
- Define which incentives can combine and which are mutually exclusive.
- Route the package according to its highest risk or combined material effect.
- Present enforceable exchanges instead of unsupported concessions.
## Send Each Type of Risk, Like Privacy or Delivery, to the Right Team
Some commitments create material exposure regardless of deal size. Route them according to the type of risk and the function capable of accepting it, while allowing independent reviews to proceed in parallel and converge into one commercial decision.
- Send privacy, security, regulatory, and unusual liability issues to qualified owners.
- Obtain delivery confirmation for nonstandard scope, timing, service levels, or penalties.
- Involve finance when billing structure, cash timing, or economic assumptions change materially.
- Combine the final positions so one approval does not invalidate another function’s assumptions.
## Check a Deal Request Is Complete Before Review Starts
Start review from a complete, stable request. A clear intake reduces follow-up loops and gives every seller equal access to the process, while an incomplete request transfers discovery work to approvers and makes service-time comparisons misleading.
- Capture the customer ask, deal context, economics, requested deviations, rationale, and deadline.
- Attach the current proposal, relevant evidence, and functional assessments.
- Return missing items with a standardized list and a simple resubmission path.
- Restart triage when a material assumption, commitment, or term changes.
## Set Separate Time Targets for Replying and for Deciding
Separate acknowledgement from decision time. The first service level covers completeness review, routing, ownership, and next steps; the second covers the time from a complete request to a documented decision. Vary decision targets by complexity while keeping acknowledgement prompt.
- Start the decision clock when the defined evidence is present.
- Stop it when the decision, rationale, conditions, and next step are communicated.
- Define narrow pause reasons and record each pause with an owner and timestamp.
- Measure typical performance and slow-tail performance rather than relying on one average.
## Prioritize Waiting Requests and Track Delays and Resubmissions
Use transparent priority and escalation rules instead of personal influence or repeated urgency messages. Monitor cases before they breach their target, and treat recurring returns or resets as evidence that intake, policy, training, or routing needs improvement.
- Prioritize by completeness, customer deadline, deal stage, materiality, and risk.
- Require a visible reason when a case moves ahead of the normal queue.
- Escalate aging cases through delegates and governance paths at defined milestones.
- Track first-pass completeness, rework loops, pause time, and reasons for delay.
## Write a Short Summary of Options for the Decision Maker
Convert a complex exception into a concise business choice. Give the decision maker enough information to compare coherent options without interpreting raw negotiations, reconciling conflicting calculations, or guessing which precedent the deal may create.
- State the requested decision, required timing, customer ask, and deal context.
- Summarize economics, cash effects, operational feasibility, material risks, and mitigations.
- Present complete options with exchanges, implications, conditions, and fallback paths.
- Identify the recommended option and the evidence supporting it.
## Record the Approval's Conditions and Expiry Date
Capture the decision in the deal record so its meaning survives handoffs, closing pressure, renewal, and audit. Approval evidence should make the result defensible and repeatable without relying on a participant’s memory.
- Record the outcome, decision role, timestamp, rationale, evidence, and identifier.
- Express conditions as terms that can be verified in the final agreement and operations.
- Define expiration and the commercial or risk changes that require renewed approval.
- Link the final proposal, agreement, exception artifacts, and downstream commitments.
## Check the Signed Deal Matches the Approval, Then Improve the Rules
Check that the signed package matches what was approved and that operating teams can see the commitments they must deliver. Then use approval data to simplify recurring decisions, strengthen guidance, and delegate stable patterns without weakening control.
- Reconcile final pricing, billing, scope, service levels, and nonstandard terms with the decision.
- Confirm that required conditions and acceptance triggers are present and measurable.
- Notify delivery, finance, customer operations, and other affected owners.
- Analyze exceptions, overrides, rework, and outcomes to revise thresholds, playbooks, and training.
